AMOTION
Timo Scoreboard

Numbers a board can trust.

Boards are asking what the AI spend bought. Most engineering leaders don’t have a number. Timo gives you one — with a frozen baseline behind it, so the before and after are real.

The measurement gap

Most companies aren't measuring this at all.

AI spend went up everywhere. Measurement didn’t follow. So the one question the board asks — what did it buy? — has no answer in most engineering companies.

46%

of companies track any AI-specific metrics at all

Fewer than half. The rest are spending without a scoreboard — usage without measurement.

Jellyfish, State of Engineering Management 2026 · 600+ leaders · vendor survey
+7.8%

median company-level throughput gain from AI

While individual output multiplies. The gap between what each developer gained and what the company gained is the number boards actually want explained.

DX, "The AI efficiency plateau" · May 2026 · 500+ companies
What the board sees

Five outcomes. Plain words.

Every engagement reports the same five. No dashboards you need a data team to read — five things a board understands on first pass.

01

Fewer defects reaching customers

And faster resolution of the ones that do.

02

More shipped per week

Shorter idea-to-customer time, measured end to end.

03

New developers productive in days, not weeks

Measured by their first merged PR.

04

Every developer trained and benchmarked

Through the Academy, active daily, measured against a baseline.

05

Every repo rated L0–L8

Like a credit rating per product — you can see which codebases are ready and which aren't.

Under the five outcomes

Three tiers of metrics — and only one is the anchor.

Usage numbers move first and prove the least. Delivery numbers are what the business feels. Cost numbers close the loop. Timo Scoreboard keeps the three apart so nobody mistakes activity for results.

Tier 1 · Leading

Adoption

Who’s actually using it. These move first — and prove nothing alone.

  • Active developerswho's using agent tools daily
  • Repos passing the gatewhich repos pass the conformance check in CI
  • Answers citing verified memoryhow many agent answers are grounded in a cited source
Tier 2 · The anchor

Delivery

What the business feels. This tier is the headline — nothing else is.

  • Deploy frequencyproduction deploys per week
  • Idea-to-customer timedays from request to production
  • Change-failure ratedeploys needing rollback or hotfix
  • Recovery timehow long incidents stay open
  • Review coveragemerges that went through a review gate
  • Senior review hoursper merged change
  • Time to first merged PRfor every new joiner
Tier 3 · Economics

Cost

What it costs — connected to what shipped, not just what was used.

  • Token spend per taskagainst the pre-install baseline
  • Cost per shipped featureall-in: inference, review time, rework
  • Cost per accepted, production-safe outcomethe composite: total spend divided by changes that shipped and stayed shipped. The number nobody else publishes.
Honest measurement, by rule

Rules we won't break — even when the number looks good.

Anyone can put charts on a screen. What makes a scoreboard worth trusting is what it refuses to do. These rules came from running measurement with real customers, not from a whiteboard.

RULE 1

Never one number.

A single metric tells a clean, false story. One number can improve while two others quietly get worse. We report the set, always — even when part of it is unflattering.

RULE 2

Baselines are frozen before we claim anything.

The baseline is captured and locked before the work starts. No moving the goalposts, no retroactive befores.

RULE 3

No individual-developer leaderboards.

Team level only. Rank individuals and people game the number — the scoreboard measures the system, not the person.

RULE 4

A metric that can’t be computed reports "—", never a guess.

If the data can’t support the number yet, the scoreboard shows the gap. Showing the gap beats faking the number.

RULE 5

Vendor usage stats are leading indicators, never a headline.

Acceptance rates and active-seat counts live in Tier 1. They never headline a report, because usage is not impact.

Where it lives

In your browser. Weekly. Against the frozen baseline.

Two reports, both readable by leadership without a translator.

The scan report

Where every repo stands today: the Readiness Score, six scored dimensions, and the fix plan. The starting point every later number is measured against.

See a scan report →

The board pack

The weekly scoreboard: every metric with a baseline, target, owner, and next action. What moved, what didn’t, and who’s doing what about it — ready to forward to the board as-is.

Open the demo →
Get your baseline

The first number is free.

Scan a repo and you have your Readiness Score in minutes — the start of a baseline a board can trust.